Legal Opinion
United States v. Swift & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 14, 1959No. 58 C 613PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
The defendants, petitioners for modification of a consent decree previously *282entered in government antitrust proceedings, have moved under Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for the production of “copies of all writings from any person, firm or corporation * * * received by the plaintiff [government] in answer to questionnaires or inquiries of the plaintiff * * Copies of the questionnaires and inquiries are appended to the motion.
The plaintiff resists the motion upon three grounds. First, it is argued that the writings sought are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mitchell v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Durkin v. Pet Milk Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- United States v. Deere & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Honorable Bernard M. Decker, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Western Fuels Ass'n v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.