People v. Knox
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County, and from an order denying a new trial. R. H. Latimer, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant, having been convicted of the crime of grand larceny, appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The information filed against the accused is in two counts, the first charging the crime of embezzlement in that he fraudulently converted to his own use an automobile, known as a “.Krit roadster,” the alleged property of one H. J. Beal, and in the second that he committed the crime of grand larceny in that he feloniously stole and carried away said automobile.
The point first called to our attention is that both counts of the information charge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- People v. DyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PhotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. McManusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. PhotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. WarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926