Legal Opinion

People v. Dye

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1915No. Crim. No. 318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Defendant was jointly with one L. S. Purdy charged with the crime of grand larceny, and upon his trial was convicted and by the judgment of the court sentenced to six years’ imprisonment in the state prison at Folsom. Defendant appealed from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The charge was that defendant, on the-day of January, 1915, did “willfully, unlawfully and feloniously steal, take and carry away certain personal property, to wit: One one-hundred dollar bill of currency, one twenty-dollar bill of currency and three ten-dollar bills of currency, . . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. PanagoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. People v. MontarialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. People v. KnoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. WarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API