Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Joseph Kones, Michele Harris

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 20, 1996No. 95-1434 and 95-1435PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Michele Harris appeals the judgment of sentence imposed on Richard Kones. At sentencing, Harris sought restitution pursuant to the restitution provisions of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-3664. The district court concluded that it had no power to order restitution because Harris was not a “victim” of Kones’ offenses within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a). We agree with this conclusion and will affirm.

I

Kones was a medical doctor licensed to practice medicine in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania when a grand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. SeligsohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Fred Frey and Robert Demas, Fred Frey, in No. 94-1594. Robert Demas, in No. 94-1605Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. Jane Doe v. Alan HeskethCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. James T. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API