Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elias Kaggen and Rio A. Sferrazza v. Internal Revenue Service and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 6, 1995No. 1152, 1613, Dockets 94-6183, 94-6185Published

1DissentJacobs, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the 1990 amendment to 26 U.S.C. § 6502(a)(1) acted *166to extend the statute of limitations in this case to April 12, 1992. See Foutz v. United States, 860 F.Supp. 788, 794 (D.Utah 1994). It is undisputed that the IRS failed to send taxpayers a timely notice of seizure on or before that date. I respectfully dissent, because I believe that failure was fatal to the IRS’s claim.

Under 26 U.S.C. § 6502(a), the IRS has ten years after assessment (or any longer period that may be stipulated) to collect by levy. Under § 6502(b), levy is deemed to have been made on the date…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Precision Etchings & Findings, Inc. v. Lgp Gem, Ltd., Maurice C. Feiger, Precision Etchings & Findings, Inc. v. Lgp Gem, Ltd., Maurice C. FeigerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Foutz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
  3. David R. Aronson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API