Legal Opinion

United States v. Hays

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1989No. 87-1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the effect of a state partnership statute on a retired partner’s liability for federal employment taxes owed by a dissolved partnership. The precise issue is whether, under the Uniform Partnership Act as adopted by Colorado, one partner’s agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to pay the dissolved partnership’s past-due employment taxes serves to discharge the other partner from liability for those taxes. The district court held that the second partner remains liable, and we affirm.1

The facts are not in dispute. John R. Hays and appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Denver National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Lawrence A. Calvey and Vivian H. Calvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. Moss v. McDonaldColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Chevron Chemical Co. v. MechamDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
  5. United States v. RossDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  2. Emmanuel A. Ballard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Livingston v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1992
  4. United States v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Hayden v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API