Legal Opinion
Livingston v. United States
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 6, 1992No. CIV 91-0001 S MJCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
CALLISTER, Senior District Judge.
The Court has before it cross-motions for summary judgment. The motions are fully briefed and at issue. Counsel have informed the Court that they desire to waive oral argument, and request the Court to rule on the pleadings submitted. The Court will resolve the motions after reviewing the background of this litigation.
The plaintiffs, Richard and Chantiva Livingston, entered into a partnership in 1985 with Thomas and Sumalee Sharp to operate the Gold Rush Inn in Mountain Home, Idaho. There is no dispute that the partnership failed to pay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Huckabee Auto Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Al T. Young v. Robert A. Riddell, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Remington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Mira v. United States (In Re Mira)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- NORTON v. UNITED STATES (In Re NORTON)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1993
- State Board of Equalization v. Leal (In Re Leal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007