Legal Opinion

Geod Corporation v. New Jersey Transit Corporation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 20, 2009No. Civil Action 04-2425 (SDW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIGENTON, District Judge.

Before this Court are both Defendants’ 1 and Plaintiffs’ 2 Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), and 1392. The Motion is decided without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED; Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Geod Corporation (“Geod”) is a New Jersey corporation,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Don Karns v. Kathleen ShanahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Don Karns v. Kathleen ShanahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Geod Corporation v. New Jersey Transit CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. BELL v. MAPLEWOODDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  5. BELL v. MAPLEWOODDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API