Legal Opinion
Henry v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 18, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4945PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKearney, District Judge
Federal law requires a debt collector provide adequate notice of a debtor's rights to dispute a debt in an effective manner from the perspective of the least sophisticated debtor. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act defines the minimum level of disclosure in the notice. Our Court of Appeals interprets federal law as requiring the debtor's dispute to be in writing. As our colleagues Judges Brody and Beetlestone just reviewed, we today address a challenge to a similar notice which notifies the debtor of her right to dispute but does not tell her the debt collector will respond only if her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chromey-Bullock v. Radius Global Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Doohan v. CTB Investors, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- GOTTESMAN v. VIRTUOSO SOURCING GROUP, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Hand v. ARB KC, LLC. DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. On 9/22/2022, this case was consolidated with 18-cv-00668-NKL. All filings should be docketed in case 18-cv-00668-NKL.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- Hand v. Beach Entertainment KC, LLC. On 9/22/2022, this case was consolidated with case number 19-cv-00108-NKL. All filings should be docketed in THIS case.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.