Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 5, 2004No. 2-02-149-CRPublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The State has filed a motion for rehearing primarily seeking an affirmance based on the court of criminal appeals’s June 23, 2004 opinion in Swearingen v. State, which clarified the standard to use in reviewing the grant or denial of a motion to suppress based on a warrant. No. 110-03, 2004 WL 1393813, at *3, 143 S.W.3d 808, 810-11 (Tex.Crim.App. June 23, 2004). We have reviewed our opinion in light of this holding and have re-written applicable portions of our opinion to apply Swearingen. We do, however, deny the State’s motion for rehearing,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Elardo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  3. Norris Shannon Baines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  4. Pool v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  5. Fenoglio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API