Legal Opinion

Wright v. Michaud

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 22, 1964PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddall, J.

On report. The Appellant’s application for a permit to “park” a mobilehome in a zone denominated as “Residential and Farming” in the zoning ordinance of the Town of Orono was denied by the Building Inspector. Although the record does not contain a copy of the appeal or decision thereon, the stipulation of the parties shows that the Appellant appealed from the decision of the Building Inspector, requesting a variance from the zoning ordinance to park his mobilehome in that zone. The stipulation also disclosed that the appeal was denied by the Board of Zoning Appeals, the board finding no facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. York Harbor Village Corp. v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  4. State v. RobbSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  5. Toulouse v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. In Re Spring Valley DevelopmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Penobscot Area Housing Development Corp. v. City of BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Your Home, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API