Legal Opinion
Seabury, Receiver v. Hall
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 14, 1934No. 13773PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
December 5, 1925, Planters’ Fertilizer & Phosphate Company entered judgment against E. Murr Hall in the office of the Clerk of Court for Sumter County. July 1, 1927, S. L. Roddey, as receiver of the stockholders’ liability fund of the People’s Bank, entered judgment against E. Murr Hall in the office of the Clerk of the Court of the same county. Neither of them issued execution then, nor did they issue and lodge executions with the1 sheriff of the county until at the time and in the circumstances hereinafter set forth. January 6,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Freedman's Savings & Trust Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Day v. WashburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- McManus v. Bank of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- State v. McCarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- AG-CHEM. EQUIP. CO., INC. v. DaggerhartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- FCX, INC. v. Long Meadow Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Dodson v. Anderson (In re Inter-Pac, Inc.)District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.