Brown v. Brown
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Carver county, entered on default, and after service of the summons by publication. • , cited McArdle v. Me Avile, 12 Minn. 98; Story on Promissory Notes, § 29; Powers on Notes and Bills, § 641; Edwards on Bills and Notes, § 512; Angelí'on Limitations, § 95.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark J.
The main question presented to us for decision in this case is whether, upon the facts stated in the complaint, the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations; and this depends upon the time of the maturity of a debt for a loan of money, — whether at the date of the loan, or of a subsequent demand for its payment. The contract between the parties is alleged to be as follows: “The plaintiff loaned to the defendant, at his request, the sum of $300, upon the terms and conditions that the same should become due and payable from the defendant to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howland v. . EdmondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Keegan v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Towlerton v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
3Cited by14 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. SpiroMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Branch v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Mitchell v. EastonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.