State v. McGraw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
RodmaN. J.
Acting contrary to the provisions of a municipal ordinance is made a misdemeanor by statute, G.S. 14-4. Notwithstanding the all-inclusive language of the statute, guilt must rest on the violation of a valid ordinance. If the ordinance is not valid, there can be no guilt. S. v. Abernethy, 190 N.C. 768, 130 S.E. 619; State v. Prevo, 178 N.C. 740, 101 S.E. 370.
Defendant admits he acted as charged. He denies the power of the town to declare such act a crime because (1) the Legislature has not delegated such authority to the town, and (2) if delegated, such delegation would do violence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Taylor v. DimmittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Ward v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Eakley v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987