Legal Opinion

State v. McGraw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1958No. 363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmaN. J.

Acting contrary to the provisions of a municipal ordinance is made a misdemeanor by statute, G.S. 14-4. Notwithstanding the all-inclusive language of the statute, guilt must rest on the violation of a valid ordinance. If the ordinance is not valid, there can be no guilt. S. v. Abernethy, 190 N.C. 768, 130 S.E. 619; State v. Prevo, 178 N.C. 740, 101 S.E. 370.

Defendant admits he acted as charged. He denies the power of the town to declare such act a crime because (1) the Legislature has not delegated such authority to the town, and (2) if delegated, such delegation would do violence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Taylor v. DimmittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Ward v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Eakley v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API