United States ex rel. Petrofsky v. Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall, McCarthy
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Julius Petrofsky brought a pro se action against a Salt Lake City law firm under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 231. Private individuals may sue under this Act in the name of the United States to uncover fraudulent claims made against the United States. 31 U.S.C. § 232(B). The statute requires the government join or withdraw from the suit within 60 days. If the United States joins, it controls the litigation; if it withdraws, the person bringing the action may proceed individually. 31 U.S.C. § 232(C). The United States specifically declined to enter Petrofsky’s suit and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burt v. City of Palm SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States for the Benefit of KenyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Application of Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Baker-Lockwood Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Barnard-Curtiss Company and the Seaboard Surety Company, Surety v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of D. W. Falls Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States ex rel. Russell v. Epic Healthcare Management GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Joseph Wojcicki v. SCANA CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States Ex Rel. Friedrich Lu v. David W. OuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Rodriguez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.