Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 13, 2009No. 06-5207PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Renee Rodriguez and Barbara King filed a qui tam complaint pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against their former employer, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center (the “Medical Center”), a New Jersey health care provider. The United States declined to intervene in the action, and the District Court ultimately dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Rodriguez and King then filed a notice of appeal 56 days after the entry of judgment. We decide whether this appeal is subject to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul E. Atkinson Eugene Schorsch v. Pa. Shipbuilding Co. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. Sun Ship, Inc., Paul E. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Mikes v. StrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. United Health Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RubashkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Max v. Republican Committee of Lancaster CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Hassler v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.