Legal Opinion

Farr v. Peterson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1895PublishedCited by 21 opinions

' Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Marquette county; R..G-. Siebeokee, . Circuit Judge. The plaintiff brought his action praying for the reforma-lion and specific performance of a certain written contract, •dated July 9, 1892, for the conveyance of a certain farm in Marquette county by him to the defendant P. H. Peterson, and the correction and reformation of' a subsequent deed of «conveyance of said farm, dated July 14, 1892, made in pursuance of said…

Read the full summary

' Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Marquette county; R..G-. Siebeokee, . Circuit Judge. The plaintiff brought his action praying for the reforma-lion and specific performance of a certain written contract, •dated July 9, 1892, for the conveyance of a certain farm in Marquette county by him to the defendant P. H. Peterson, and the correction and reformation of' a subsequent deed of «conveyance of said farm, dated July 14, 1892, made in pursuance of said contract, by inserting in said contract and ■■deed, as a part of the description of the lands therein de•scribed, the words,…

1Opinion of the CourtPinney, J.

1. There is no preponderance of evidence against the finding of the court upon the issue on the equitable cause of action set out in the complaint. It would be of no service to set out the substance of the evidence, or to enter upon any discussion of it. That part of the judgment which denies the plaintiff any equitable relief must therefore be affirmed.

2. Whether the defendant, in the exercise of ordinary care and prudence, as an ordinarily intelligent man, under the circumstances shown in this case, ought to have relied upon the statements and representations made to him, and to have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Chrysler v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Brown v. LeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Mamlock v. FairbanksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Prince v. OverholserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Miranovitz v. GeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. J. H. Clark Co. v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Kaiser v. NummerdorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ross v. Northrup, King & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API