Legal Opinion

Mamlock v. Fairbanks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwauhee County. The defendant appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

This action is brought to set aside, the contract by which the plaintiff, by her agent, one Marcus Silber, purchased of the defendant a certain note and mortgage executed by one John E. Eandall to one Joel E. Ackerman, and to recover back the purchase money therefor, on the ground of false and fraudulent representations made by the defendant to the agent, Silber, at the time of the purchase, as to the adequacy of the mortgage security, and as to the responsibility, identity and residence of the parties, which formed the inducement of the contract.

On'the trial, the agent, Silber, testified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Warner v. BenjaminWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kaiser v. NummerdorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ross v. Northrup, King & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API