Legal Opinion

State v. Rasmussen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. Crim. 940113PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of driving under suspension, after the trial court concluded justification or excuse was unavailable as a matter of law. Because we hold justification or excuse could apply, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

In the early morning hours of January 13, 1994, the elevator manager at Windsor reported an apparent break-in at the grain elevator. As the Stutsman County deputy sheriffs approached Windsor, they noticed a vehicle about a quarter mile off Interstate 94, near the edge of town. Fresh tracks led from the car, from house to house, and then…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MichlitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. PattenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. EldredNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HolteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. TreisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. KleppeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API