Legal Opinion

State v. Willcutt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 1974No. 73-2648PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

This is an appeal of a conviction for criminal activity in drugs in which defendant seeks reversal of the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence. Defendant claims the evidence used at trial was seized pursuant to a warrant which failed to specify with sufficient particularity the premises to be searched, more specifically, that the building described in the search warrant and supporting affidavit is actually a multiple-occupancy structure with subunits and the warrant did not specify the subunits to be searched.

Initially, we note that a multiple-occupancy struc ture is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. SanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. KobersteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Vázquez MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  2. Lebedun v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  3. State v. CoatneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Bing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API