State v. Willcutt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
This is an appeal of a conviction for criminal activity in drugs in which defendant seeks reversal of the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence. Defendant claims the evidence used at trial was seized pursuant to a warrant which failed to specify with sufficient particularity the premises to be searched, more specifically, that the building described in the search warrant and supporting affidavit is actually a multiple-occupancy structure with subunits and the warrant did not specify the subunits to be searched.
Initially, we note that a multiple-occupancy struc ture is not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. SanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. KobersteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pueblo v. Vázquez MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
- Lebedun v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- State v. CoatneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Bing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.