Bing v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of commercial gambling in that he intentionally recorded a bet on an athletic contest. OCGA § 16-12-22 (a) (2). He enumerates as error numerous rulings made by the trial court during the trial, as well as the denial of several pre-trial motions. He also questions the sufficiency of the evidence.
1. Appellant asserts as error the denial of his motion to suppress. He contends that the search warrant was an illegal general warrant which did not state with sufficient particularity the person and premises to be searched. The warrant authorized a search of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- DePalma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Midura v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.