Legal Opinion

United States v. Globe Indemnity Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 25, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I shall very reluctantly direct a verdict for the plaintiff in this case.

I. This is an action brought by the government against the Globe Indemnity Company on a bond executed by that company in the sum of $75,000 as surety to secure disputed income taxes of J. A. Migel, Inc., for its fiscal year beginning December 1, 1918, and ending November 30, 1919.

The principal amount of the tax has all been paid and this suit is brought to recover interest only from November 15, 1920, the date on which the fourth installment payment became due, to wit :(1) Interest on the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Girard Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Standard Portland Cement Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. Heinemann Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erb v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API