Legal Opinion
United States v. Heinemann Chemical Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 25, 1936No. 7053PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
This is an action on a bond given to the United States by the Pleinemann Chem*366ical Company as principal, and the American Surety Company as surety, to secure an extension of time for the payment of income taxes and interest assessed against the Heinemann Chemical Company for the year 1918.
The case was heard on stipulation of facts and proofs. The only matter not stipulated was the admissibility in evidence of a letter dated July 20, 1923, from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to" the collector of internal revenue at Pittsburgh with reference to holding the bond…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Providence Engineering Corp. v. Downey Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Minturn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heinemann Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- United States v. Globe Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- William C. Atwater & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936