Legal Opinion

Ned George Forman v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1979No. 77-4030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Ned George Forman appeals from the federal district court’s denial of habeas relief. We affirm.

I. Statement of the Case

On April 29, 1974, Forman pleaded guilty in Nevada state court to an information charging illegal sale of cocaine and received a sentence of fifteen years in Nevada state prison. Two years later the Nevada Supreme Court held that the statute under which Forman had been prosecuted required the prosecution to allege and prove the defendant’s age as an essential element of the crime. Hass v. State, 92 Nev. 256, 548 P.2d 1367 (1976).

Forman then filed a petition for habeas corpus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Juan Gerardo RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mileham v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Andrew G. Holguin, Jr. v. Robert R. RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Stevens v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kreidel v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API