Legal Opinion
Andrew G. Holguin, Jr. v. Robert R. Raines
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1982No. 80-5782PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Andrew Holguin, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that the district court erred in concluding that the Arizona Department of Correction’s change in its method of calculating parole eligibility on consecutively imposed sentences, which applied retroactively to his detriment, did not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws contained in the United States Constitution. We affirm.
I
On July 8, 1972, Holguin began serving three concurrent ten to twenty year sentences after conviction on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- William J. Prater v. U.S. Parole Commission and Thomas Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Maurice R. Lerner v. Matthew Gill, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John Roy RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Tiller v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Thomas M. Roth v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.