Legal Opinion
State v. Egbert, Unpublished Decision (2-21-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 2006No. CA2004-12-304UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Frank Egbert, appeals the decision of the Hamilton Municipal Court to deny his motion to suppress evidence related to a charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol ("DUI"). Judgment affirmed.
{¶ 2} Appellant was charged with DUI under R.C.4511.19(A)(1), now R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), after he was involved in an automobile accident in the city of Hamilton in September 2003. Appellant filed a motion to suppress evidence. The trial court granted part of his motion, but overruled a majority of the issues. Appellant subsequently pled no contest and was found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Newark v. LucasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Oregon v. SzakovitsOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Fairfield v. RegnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. HummelOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. WenzelOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Thompson v. Warden, North Central Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025