Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1905No. 2864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Nueces. Tried below before Hon. W. B. Hopkins. Appeal from a conviction of keeping and exhibiting a gaming table or bank; penalty, a fine of $25 and ten days confinement in the county jail, The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of keeping and exhibiting a gaming table and bank, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and ten days in jail.

The facts show, in substance, that appellant owned the table upon which the game of craps was played; that he participated in the game, as .the other players did, and in contemplation of law he was not the keeper and exhibitor of a gaming table or bank, but was merely guilty of violating the gaming statute. The distinction between a gaming table or bank or an ordinary game of chance is laid down in Webb v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 205;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Sirmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Hairston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haycraft v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Angelo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API