Legal Opinion

Haycraft v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 29, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Dietzman—

Reversing.

On April 13,1931, C. E. Morgan, the county attorney of Hardin county, while walking down Main street of Elizabethtown, observed a Tudor Ford sedan parked near the curb. On glancing through the windows, he saw in the rear of the automobile two slot machines. They were, in the main, covered by a thin spread, but their outline was plainly visible through the thin covering, and the little top plate peculiar to slot machines and which provides a receptacle in which the nickel which operates it is dropped was uncovered and plainly visible. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Mexico v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eccles v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Hurvich v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Hickerson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. In Re Estate of WeisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API