Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1903No. 2635PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The essential facts of the case are sufficiently shown by the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDEBSOlSr, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life; hence this appeal.

On the impanelment of the jury, appellant excepted to the abtion of the court in overruling his objection to G. H. Eagan, who had been summoned on the special venire. This juror answered that he had heard of the case, and from what he had heard he had formed an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant; that it would require evidence to remove this opinion, but that he could go into the jury box and try the case fairly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Godwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Holley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Brooks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Sparks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Hiles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Howe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API