Legal Opinion
Apau v. Printpack Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 8, 2010No. Civil Action 09-685-JJFPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Printpack Inc.’s (“Printpack”) Motion To Dismiss (D.I. 6) under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff Edward 0. Apau opposes the Motion. (D.I. 10.)
For the reasons discussed, the Court will deny in part and grant in party Print-pack’s Motion to Dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
The instant action was initiated by Plaintiff on September 16, 2009, with the filing of his Complaint. (D.I. 1.) Mr. Apau asserts five claims relating to employment discrimination, specifically race discrimination under Title VII (Count I), national origin…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bhatnagar v. MeyerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Patton v. Quality Enterprises, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
- Rodriguez v. Wendover, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Vega v. Vecellio & Grogan, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020