Legal Opinion
Tyee Consolidated Mining Co. v. Langstedt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1905No. 1,098PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
The writ of error presents the question whether, in the territory of Alaska, adverse possession of a mining claim, as against the locator thereof, or his successors in interest, can be initiated at any time before the issuance of a patent from the United States therefor.
Section 1042 of Carter’s Codes of Alaska (page 354) provides as follows: “The uninterrupted adverse notorious possession of real property under color and claim of title for seven years or more shall be conclusively presumed to give title thereto except as against the United States.”
Section 4 of the same Codes, at page 146,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bagnell v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Henshaw v. BissellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Clark v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1938
- Valentine v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1910
- Nelson v. Green Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Pioneer Mining Co. v. Pacific Coal Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.