Legal Opinion

Melton Bros. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 4, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TRENCHARD, J.

These three separate suits in chancery were begun by the complainant, Melton Bros., Incorporated, and all three defendant companies have appealed from decrees in favor of the complainant.

The suits were consolidated for the purpose of hearing in the court below, and pursuant to a stipulation they have been argued here as one suit, and the pleadings, evidence, decree and further proceedings in the suit against the Philadelphia Pire and Marine Insurance Company have been laid before us with the statement that they “are identical, so far as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McQuaid Market House Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Boutross v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Innis v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. Management Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Heller v. Hartz Mountain IndustriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Calais Company, Inc. v. Kyzer IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Mitchell v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Mitchell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API