Legal Opinion

Boutross v. Palatine Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1917No. 20,869; No. 20,870; No. 20,871PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; William H. McCamish, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

These are actions upon an appraisal and award by arbitrators appointed under the provisions of insurance policies issued by the defendants covering loss by fire on plaintiffs’ stock of merchandise. The assured and the insurance companies having disagreed on the amount of loss, an agreement was signed submitting the loss to two appraisers; A. M. Smith being named by the assured, and H. W. Potts by the .defendants. In accordance with the provisions in the policies the two appraisers duly appointed John C. Dieckman as umpire. The petitions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. State Bank v. BrecheisenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Melton Bros. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  3. Mitchell v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Mitchell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API