Legal Opinion

Dyett v. Seymour

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Hew York county; George C. Barrett, Justice. In this action by Arthur Dyett, survivor of A. B. L. Horton, against James M. and Allen L. Seymour and James A. Baker, an order for defendants’ examination before trial was granted, and they appeal. For opinion on appeal from order for the production of books, etc., see post, 842.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of one John C. Eno, to recover from the defendants a large sum of money alleged to have been obtained from said Eno by means of false and fraudulent representations made by the defendants to said Eno,—such representations being to the effect that the defendants had bought and sold certain stocks for him as his brokers, and that upon said transactions certain large losses had occurred, which losses said Eno paid; whereas in fact the defendants did not maké such purchases and sales, and such losses were never incurred. By the proposed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. GoodNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Williams v. FolsomNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Leach v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Dyett v. SeymourNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Fluchtwanger v. DessarNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API