Legal Opinion

Dyett v. Seymour

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1889Published

At chambers. Application by defendants, James M. Seymour, Allen L. Seymour, and James A. Baker, for discovery of certain reports. For opinions •on former proceedings in the same case, see 2 H. Y. Supp. 841, 842.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The plaintiff obtained an order for the examination of the-defendants before trial, which, upon appeal to the general term, was affirmed. 2 N. Y. Supp. 841. Two of the defendants, James M. and Allen L. Seymour, have been examined pursuant to such order; and the defendants now apply for a discovery of certain reports which they claim to have rendered to the-plaintiff’s assignor. Rule 15 of the general rules of practice provides that the moving papers upon an application for discovery or inspection of books or-papers shall state the facts and circumstances on which the same is claimed, and that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dyett v. SeymourNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API