Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Pollock

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original application by Ole B. Tuttle for mandamus to be directed to Charles A. Pollock, Judge of the Third Judicial District.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

This is an application to this court for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the respondent as judge of the district court of the Third judicial district to proceed to settle a statement of the case in an action for a divorce between Martha C. Tuttle, plaintiff, and Ole B. Tuttle, defendant, which was tried before the respondent in the county of Traill, within said district, and is now pending in this court on an appeal by the defendant in that action, which was perfected on September 10, 1909. The application for said writ is brought before this court on notice duly served upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. State ex rel. Priddy v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People ex rel. North American Restaurant v. ChetlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People ex rel. Hall v. HoldomIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blood v. HowardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Folsom v. NortonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Williams v. HutchinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API