Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1889No. 13,302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee’s counsel insist that there can be no appeal from the order of the board of commissioners directing a reassessment to pay the expense of constructing a *120free gravel road. In this they are in error. The board has no authority to make a reassessment without notice, and upon notice the land-owners are entitled to come in and defend. Board, etc., v. Fullen, post, p. 158; Board, etc., v. Fahlor, 114 Ind. 176; Abbett v. Board, etc., 114 Ind. 61; Board, etc., v. Fullen, 111 Ind. 410; Board, etc., v. Gruver, 115 Ind. 224. The notice of the intention to make a reassessment does not,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Waldo v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Wright v. DefreesIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. State v. . Beverly JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  5. Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. SellersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bowen v. HesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kirsch v. BraunIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Guckien v. RothrockIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API