Legal Opinion

San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Blair

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1917No. 3947PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Dissenting opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.

House. Bill No. 39, entitled “An act to relieve the crowded condition of the dockets of the Supreme Court,” etc., hereinafter called Relief Act, was passed by the Thirty-Fifth Legislature, and approved March 15, 1917, effective immediately. Acts 1917, c. 76, p. 142.-Shortly afterward, treating said statute as valid, and without then writing upon the subject, our Supreme Court, acting as a court, this writer dissenting, undertook to put it into operation, thereby, in effect, upholding its constitutionality. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Ry. Co. v. Blair (opinion by our Chief Justice Phillips,…

2Cases cited184 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  4. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  5. Todd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. OlsenTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dallas Morning News v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gurvich v. Tyree, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  4. City of Ft. Worth v. Capps Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. In re Subdivision Six of Supreme Court Jurisdiction Act of 1917Texas Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API