Rostack Invs., Inc. v. Sabella
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, J.*
*73Plaintiff Rostack Investments, Inc. obtained a summary judgment against defendant Angela Sabella in an amount exceeding $50 million. We reversed the judgment on appeal, and awarded Sabella her costs as prevailing party. Sabella's memorandum of costs sought to recover approximately $1.4 million in costs related to her obtaining a surety bond, secured by a letter of credit, pending the appeal. Rostack moved to tax those costs, on the basis that they were neither reasonable nor necessary, in that Sabella had sufficient assets to obtain *529a cash-collateralized bond (without needing a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kurwa v. KislingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. StranskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ayala Boring v. HPS Mechanical CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021