O'Neill v. Hicks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
A complaint seeking to enjoin twenty named defendants and a large number sued by fictitious names from violating certain restrictions, alleged to have been imposed by agreement upon about 100 lots in Hopper & Sons Western Avenue Tract in the city of Los Angeles, was filed in the court below. Eleven of the defendants interposed a general and special demurrer, which was sustained without leave to amend. Thereafter the judge signed a document entitled “Judgment Sustaining Demurrer,” which, after reciting preliminary matters, reads as follows: “The demurrer of defendants to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- De La Beckwith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. CarilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Percy v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Percy v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931