Legal Opinion
Glen Holly Entertainment, Inc. v. Tektronix, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 15, 1999No. CV 99-02476 SVW (RCx)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING ANTITRUST CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
As is so often the case in antitrust law, a deceptively simple set of facts forces the Court to confront a doctrinal quagmire. This case requires the Court to determine whether a rental firm, owning and renting only one type of video editing system, suffers antitrust injury if the only two manu facturers of video editing systems conspire to discontinue this particular type of video editing system and thereby render the rental firm’s current inventory obsolete and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Streamcast Networks, Inc. v. Skype Technologies, S.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.