Legal Opinion

Smith v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1919No. L. A. No. 4374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. T. Clotfelter, M. W. Reed, Paul Burks, and Robert Brennan, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This appeal was originally taken to this court and was by it assigned to the district court of appeal for the second district. The justices of 'that court, being unable to agree, it ha" been transferred to this court for hearing and determination. As to all of the points presented upon this appeal, with one exception, the opinion of Mr. Victor E. Shaw, written while the case was before the district court of appeal, correctly determines them against the appellants’ contention, and hence that portion of his said opinion, reading as follows, is hereby adopted as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Steinberger v. California Electric Garage Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Malone v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Smith v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Dillon v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Akers v. Kelley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API