Legal Opinion

Waymart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.

SCI Waymart (Employer) petitions for review of a determination of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), granting Robert F. Feldman’s (Claimant’s) claim petition. 1 We affirm.

On April 16, 1997, Claimant filed a claim petition alleging that on April 20, 1994, he contracted Hepatitis C as a result of an incident which occurred while he was employed as a corrections officer by Employer. Specifically, the claim petition alleged that Claimant was contaminated through situations where he had contact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Tapco, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Cromie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Hills Department Store 59 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Orenich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Kerstetter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Pennsylvania Steel Technology)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. D. Morales v. WCAB (SD of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. D.L. Rowe v. WCAB (County of York)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API