Legal Opinion

Hills Department Store 59 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 1994No. 1684 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Hills Department Store # 59 (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s decision to deny Employer’s modification petition. We affirm.

While working for Employer, Cynthia A. McMullen (Claimant) sustained an injury to her ankle for which she received compensation for total disability pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable. Subsequently, Employer allegedly offered Claimant sedentary work, believing that Claimant could perform such work despite her injury. However, Claimant did not return to work for Employer.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Northeastern Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Czap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Buczynski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sherrod v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Davis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. ABF Freight Systems, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Dana Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API