Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Armitage

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 3, 1981No. Appeal No. 81-530Published

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences (board) awarding priority of invention to Armitage, the senior party-applicant,1 on the ground that the junior party-patentee Thomson et al.2 (Thomson) had not demonstrated an actual reduction to practice predating Armitage’s effective filing date. We affirm.

Background

The Counts

The subject matter in interference concerns a particular class of ethylene-carbox-ylic acid copolymers and a process for their synthesis. There are nine phantom counts involved, but the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Heard v. BurtonUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Langer v. KaufmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Robert L. Dreyfus and John W. Harrison v. Martin M. SternauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API