Legal Opinion
Bandera Drilling Co. v. Lavino
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 6, 1992No. 11-91-001-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARNOT, Justice.
Bandera Drilling Co., Inc. (hereinafter “Bandera”), brought suit for foreclosure of a statutory mineral lien1 against the operator and working interest owners under an oil, gas, and mineral lease. The trial court rendered summary judgment in favor of the working interest owners, E.J. Lavino, II; Robert W. Twiford; Robert W. Henderson; and Reliance Trusts, appel-lees.2 We reverse and remand.
*783On October 18, 1985, Computech Energy & Exploration, Inc. (hereinafter “Compu-tech”) contracted with Bandera to drill certain wells designated as the “King 2-S” and “King 3-S” wells in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Texcalco, Inc. v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bancroft v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- McCarty v. Halliburton Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. v. Heritage Consolidated, L.L.C. (In Re Heritage Consolidated, L.L.C.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Shell Western E & P, Inc. v. Pel-State Bulk Plant, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P v. HeritageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Harrison v. Aztec Well Servicing CoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
- PADCO Energy Services, LLC v. Case Energy Services, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.