Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Aztec Well Servicing Co

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 14, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00038Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION STACEY HARRISON, et al, Plaintiffs, v. No, 1:20-CV-038-H AZTEC WELL SERVICING CO.,, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION Several motions are pending before the Court. First, Harrison seeks leave to amend his second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 35), and the defendants move to strike Harrison's third amended complaint (Dkt. No. 42). The Court grants Harrison’s motion for leave to amend and, therefore, denies the defendants’ motion to strike as moot. Two dispositive motions are also pending—the defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API