Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Farmers Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 2008No. CC 9910-11479; CA A128598; SC S054486PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
This is an action on an automobile insurance policy. Plaintiffs insured vehicle suffered property damage in an accident. Defendants 1 paid for repairs to the vehicle, but the repairs did not restore the vehicle to its preaccident condition. Defendants contended that they were responsible for only the cost of the repairs. Plaintiff claimed that the policy made defendants liable for plaintiffs entire “loss” and that, if the attempted repair could not restore the vehicle to its pre-accident condition, then defendants were responsible for the diminution of the value of the vehicle due to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Holloway v. Republic Indem. Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Holloway v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Dunmire Motor Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Rossier v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine InsurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Moeller v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Capitol Specialty Insurance v. Chan & Lui, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.