Legal Opinion

Moeller v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 16, 2010No. 30880-1-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

¶1 David Moeller insured his automobile through Farmers Insurance Company. After the vehicle sustained damage in a collision, Farmers paid the full cost of repairs, less a deductible. Moeller claimed that the policy covered loss for the diminished value of his vehicle, but Farmers disagreed.

¶2 Moeller filed a class action lawsuit, alleging breach of contract, insurance bad faith, and violations of the Washington Administrative Code and Consumer Protection Act (CPA).1 The trial court certified a class under CR 23(b)(3). It then granted Farmers’ motion for summary judgment, finding that the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fosmire v. Progressive Max InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  3. Chavez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. at PascoWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Ibrahim v. AIU InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Teck Metals, Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API