Legal Opinion
Gleason v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1962No. Civ. 25995PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to plaintiffs’ fifth amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
Plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory relief sought a declaration that -. certain provisions of the California Redevelopment Law are unconstitutional; appropriations made by the City of Santa Monica to the Redevelopment Agency are ultra vires and illegal expenditures of municipal funds; the Redevelopment Agency of Santa Monica has received funds from the City of Santa Monica without any authority of law; an ordinance approving and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Stafford v. Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Old Town Dev. Corp. v. Urban Renewal Agency of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re Baby Boy T.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Town of Sheboygan v. City of SheboyganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Plunkett v. City of LakewoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Beverly Finance Co. v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.